News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Forestry.io by aug-riedinger on Saturday July 16, 2016 @08:41AM (#12106159)
I agree that the project not being open-source is a great no-go.

You guys should consider replicating the Wordpress model: open-source tools and paid plans for hosting & support.

Don't think that S3 or github pages are too simple for a user to being autonomous in deployment. IMHO typical use case for your product is a tech guyssetting things up for some non tech people to administrate and write content afterwards.

This means the keys are : - 0 tech steps in administration (no git push, no jekyll generate etc.) - plugins - plugins - plugins - themes - plugins

But clearly if this can become an alternative to WP, this is great because devs hate WP and it scales really bad, while static websites is the complete opposite.

Re:Forestry.io by anticopernicus on Sunday July 17, 2016 @12:04AM (#12108984)
I totally agree, although i would pay money for this code. Not being able to modify it makes it unusable in a custom jekyll setup.