Re:Lightning Network: Scalable, Instant Bitcoin/Blockchain T...
by fraggle222 on Friday July 15, 2016 @11:26AM
(#12101654)
>Unfortunately, the block size limit was set too large and this created outsized returns for large consolidations.
Can you clarify this statement?
Dunno, not enough to be broken out on the reports I have. They're not an investor that I've ever met with-- we have a lot of investors. Though it's a cute technique that y'all have been using where you try asking something that would be confidential, to try to inhibit a response on the long list of leading questions that follows.
>> "A couple people out of a community of around 50-200 depending on the phase of the moon."
> Again a lie. The top Core devs are Blockstream employees.
I gave a breakout in another post; if you want to go by top you end up with three out of the top 10, all of whom were founders of the company. wooo.
> Blockstream has created a toxic environment and a huge ivory tower.
What does that even mean? or another way, how could someone falsify that claim?
> Meanwhile 80%+ of the hasrate is concentrated in a single country and in the hands of a handful of entities
Unfortunately, the block size limit was set too large and this created outsized returns for large consolidations. More recent improvements have caught things up a bit but it will take a while for the damage to equalize out.
> People associated with BlockstreamCore support censored and manipulated forums,
What the @#$@ are you talking about? Citations? Or are you just saying that anyone of the vast majority of people who are supportive of our work is "associated"?