News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cassandra 0.5.0 released by xal on Sunday March 21, 2010 @05:43PM (#1208665)
Olden but golden? In fact it looks like 0.6 realease is really far along. It's read performance got so good that a bunch of sites are ditching memcached(db) in favor of it.

Speaking of Cassandra, can anyone confirm that facebook is actually moving from Cassandra to hbase?

Re:Cassandra 0.5.0 released by eevans on Sunday March 21, 2010 @07:12PM (#1208812)
Facebook is tight-lipped about such matters. I do not think you're going to get confirmation here, (not one that I would trust).
Re:Cassandra 0.5.0 released by fizx on Sunday March 21, 2010 @10:54PM (#1209155)
Facebook is using both.
Re:Cassandra 0.5.0 released by henrikschroder on Sunday March 21, 2010 @09:00PM (#1208990)
Memcached is a completely different product, why would you stop using that just because you start using Cassandra?

Memcaheddb on the other hand is, IMHO, a misguided project. People ditching that is a very good thing. :-)

Re:Cassandra 0.5.0 released by kingkilr on Sunday March 21, 2010 @09:05PM (#1208998)
The argument is that memcached is unnecessary because of the speed of Cassandra, and the fact that .6 includes it's own, built in, row level cache.

[cite] http://twitter.com/ericflo/status/9402946197

Re:Cassandra 0.5.0 released by kingkilr on Tuesday March 23, 2010 @02:35AM (#1212386)
What I've heard is that facebook is using Cassandra exclusively for inboxes (and that they're using hbase for a bunch of other stuff).
Re:Cassandra 0.5.0 released by noah256 on Sunday March 21, 2010 @09:03PM (#1208994)
Re:Cassandra 0.5.0 released by ericflo on Sunday March 21, 2010 @05:40PM (#1208659)
...in January.