Re:The World of Subversive Garfield Spinoffs
by davidw on Tuesday July 12, 2016 @01:53PM
(#12081057)
I liked Calvin and Hobbes a lot, but it all depends on one's tastes; I make no claim that any of them are objectively 'good' or 'bad'. I do think C&H seems to have a lot more effort and thought behind it than Garfield or many of the Peanuts strips.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I don't feel like I'm going too far out of my way to suggest that a lot of newspaper syndicated strips are objectively bad, because the artists complain about the same issues themselves. They've been boxed in to such a small literal physical area that it becomes hard to do anything "artistic".
A few of them still manage to do some good work, but great work is almost physically impossible now.
And if what you want is merely good work, there's probably a dozen "good" webcomics now for every "good" syndicated comic out there. In fact I think I stumble on a "good" webcomic every three months or so, only to notice that it has 5+ years of archives available. (I do this on purpose; in many cases, the webcomic that is "good" when I find it really wasn't particularly good in the first couple of years.)
Re:The World of Subversive Garfield Spinoffs
by Uhhrrr on Tuesday July 12, 2016 @04:08PM
(#12081950)
Calvin and Hobbes's creator really liked Schulz's work: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB119214690326956694