Re:Google to Train 2 Million Indian Android Developers
by akshatpradhan on Monday July 11, 2016 @03:10PM
(#12073507)
Are you suggesting training DOES NOT help reduce risk associated with Malware Apps? If that's what you're saying, then we should throw Secure Development Training and Security Awareness Training out the window for everybody. :)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google to Train 2 Million Indian Android Developers
by grenoire on Monday July 11, 2016 @03:20PM
(#12073590)
No, he is pointing out that this will lead to more Indian malware applications on the Play Store.
Re:Google to Train 2 Million Indian Android Developers
by akshatpradhan on Monday July 11, 2016 @03:47PM
(#12073816)
From what I understand, you're saying more Developer Training will lead to more Indian malware apps?
Re:Google to Train 2 Million Indian Android Developers
by zo1 on Monday July 11, 2016 @04:11PM
(#12074041)
They are saying that more indian developers doing android development will lead to more indian malware apps.
Re:Google to Train 2 Million Indian Android Developers
by strikerj on Monday July 11, 2016 @03:44PM
(#12073783)
Are you saying malware apps are created inadvertently? If anything this would lead to more complex malware apps.
Re:Google to Train 2 Million Indian Android Developers
by akshatpradhan on Monday July 11, 2016 @03:50PM
(#12073857)
>If anything this would lead to more complex malware apps.
Are you saying that Indians who get trained in Development will consciously become more nefarious and wittingly release more malware?
I honestly feel like you can say that about any group of developers in the world. There's bound to be 1 bad actor in every group. That's just security.
Re:Google to Train 2 Million Indian Android Developers
by mixedCase on Monday July 11, 2016 @03:54PM
(#12073893)
>become more nefarious
Hello this is Pajeet from Microsoft I think your computer crash because you didn't do the reality check.
Re:Google to Train 2 Million Indian Android Developers
by vemy on Monday July 11, 2016 @04:33PM
(#12074288)
> Pajeet
I am not sure what you are trying to imply.