Re:As Japan's population shrinks, bears and boars roam among...
by JoeAltmaier on Monday July 11, 2016 @11:50AM
(#12071867)
Many animal populations have non-reproductive members. It takes a village to raise a child. In such an extremely social animal as Homo Sapiens, many of our adaptations are social. E.g. it only takes a few men to guarantee another generation, yet 50% men are born in each. Another: we don't die the instant we give birth; we're there (and non-reproductive) for decades afterward, competing for resources. Its the social benefits that allow for this.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:As Japan's population shrinks, bears and boars roam among...
by makomk on Tuesday July 12, 2016 @09:22AM
(#12078732)
There's something called Fisher's principle that explains why the sex ratio of most species is 50:50. In short, if less than 50% of humans are men, then men must have more children on average than women and it becomes reproductively advantageous to have more make kids in order to take advantage of it.
Re:As Japan's population shrinks, bears and boars roam among...
by JoeAltmaier on Tuesday July 12, 2016 @09:32AM
(#12078786)
Still, in many animal populations the ratio 1:1 doesn't hold. Something else is going on then.
Re:As Japan's population shrinks, bears and boars roam among...
by internaut on Friday July 15, 2016 @03:17PM
(#12103202)
I think it's not quite 1:1 in humans, the males have a slight lead.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-a-pregnant-woma...