The case was not repeated since that, so tomato pesticides aren't really a strong candidate. A lot of the tomatoes eaten in Germany, Holland and other European countries are from Spain (and pass strict quality tests in those countries) and nobody developped the same symptoms ever. Tomato production created a new type of spanish landscape in fact, that we call "the sea of plastic".
In my family we use exclusively olive oil for all. In any case, I will love to taste the sazanqua oil, that is the equivalent to an olive tree for japanese and is reputed also as excelent. Have somebody tried it?
When I was child, we drank real milk, directly from the cow and just boiled. Is a totally different product, with lots of fat. Milk today has the same flavor as sucking a whitewashed wall.
Spanish people weren't buying "fake olive oil" when poisoned. This was canola oil, was advertised as canola oil, and everybody in Spain can spot the difference among the wine and cider or between the cheapest olive oil and other vegetable oils. All this paragraph is false, including the “No one is checking, Olmsted writes".
Not, Your salmon is most probably true salmon, because to use fake salmon is a mess when the true species is breeded in farms since decades, is relatively cheap, can be found easily in your market, and its origin can be tracked easily by the tag.
There is only an "acceptable" substitute to salmon available, and is rainbow trout feeded with carothenes; smaller and more expensive to produce for farmers than true salmon. This is like to say that your coke bottle is probably faked because in the restaurant somebody could refill it with other thing of equal value or more expensive.
Yes, I must admit that milk is basically a cheap imitation currently, and there is a lot of things that must improve in tracking fisheries and marine species, but spreading fears and saying that nobody is surveying this is not correct. You have the NOAA for example, blatantly ignored in the article.