That's not true. Some parts (e.g. CSS and images) never were open source.
You can read more about why RhodeCode went back to open source (AGPL) here: https://rhodecode.com/blog/113/rhodecode-goes-open-source
You can read more about why RhodeCode went back to open source (AGPL) here: https://rhodecode.com/blog/113/rhodecode-goes-open-source
> The company claimed to have 100% of the copyright in RhodeCode, even though patches had been accepted from others
https://lwn.net/Articles/609709/