Re:Introducing Verve: minimalistic, static, functional language
by doomrobo on Friday July 08, 2016 @06:31PM
(#12059050)
Nice work. One note: what you defined in your example is an algebraic data type, but not a generalized algebraic data type. The data constructors' are implicitly defined, as opposed to being explicitly defined. I liked this wiki page as a guide https://wiki.haskell.org/GADTs_for_dummies
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Introducing Verve: minimalistic, static, functional language
by tadeuzagallo on Friday July 08, 2016 @07:03PM
(#12059182)
Fixed it, thanks!