Re:Reddit now tracks all outbound link clicks by default, ex...
by derefr on Friday July 08, 2016 @04:16AM
(#12054191)
Do they still bother to do this in Chrome, even though Chrome supports the <a> ping attribute that obviates the need for it (and which was presumably added to Chrome exactly for Google Search's own use-case)?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Reddit now tracks all outbound link clicks by default, ex...
by jacquesm on Friday July 08, 2016 @04:19AM
(#12054199)
I don't know, I don't use Chrome.
> even though Chrome supports the <a> ping attribute that obviates the need for it (and which was presumably added to Chrome exactly for Google Search's own use-case)?
And that's one reason why I don't use Chrome.
There is so much wrong with a company adding features to their browser in order to facilitate special cases for their own website.
Re:Reddit now tracks all outbound link clicks by default, ex...
by andybak on Friday July 08, 2016 @04:47AM
(#12054280)
> There is so much wrong with a company adding features to their browser in order to facilitate special cases for their own website.
Isn't <a> ping good for the end user? Unless you disagree with any ability to track outbound clicks - in which case we can politely agree to disagree.
Re:Reddit now tracks all outbound link clicks by default, ex...
by vidarh on Friday July 08, 2016 @08:14AM
(#12054911)
Even if you disagree with the ability to track outbound clicks, ping would be good as if it becomes the main way of tracking clicks you'd be able to stop tracking by turning it off. When people do tracking by rewriting links server-side, on the other hand, you don't have an easy out.
I don't see this as a special case at all - a substantial proportion of link shortener usage, for example, is not for link shortening, but because most of them offer analytics.