Re:Reddit now tracks all outbound link clicks by default, ex...
by jupenur on Friday July 08, 2016 @02:10AM
(#12053833)
Is there a reason to do something like this using a bounce address? I mean, that's what at least all the big players seem to be doing, but couldn't you just as well use something like A PING [1] or some sort of Ajax pingback? There's browser compatibility of course, but supporting old IEs shouldn't be critical for something like this.
[1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/a#...
Re:Reddit now tracks all outbound link clicks by default, ex...
by bruce_one on Friday July 08, 2016 @02:50AM
(#12053947)
Hmm...
I know a few sites that do it (including Google and DDG); so I guess some people feel it's the best way to do it?
Edit: Ping doesn't look to be in the HTML5 spec anymore, maybe that's got something to do with it?
https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-html5-20141028/single-page.ht...
Re:Reddit now tracks all outbound link clicks by default, ex...
by jupenur on Friday July 08, 2016 @03:47AM
(#12054101)
> Ping doesn't look to be in the HTML5 spec anymore
Interesting, I didn't know that. And now that I look at it, ping is only supported in Chrome and Opera, which explains it even better. I would still expect there to be some other alternatives to bounce addresses, though.
(Bounces seem like they should be quick, but often seem not to be -- and if I'm sitting there with a bounce page open rather than the article I want to read when I've just run out of reception, it's super lame (in my mind: infinitely lame).)
From a statistics perspective, I often find an article elsewhere and then come here to vote for it (or submit it) -- so it's inaccurate from that perspective.
Ultimately: indifferent.