News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Experimenting with Post-Quantum Cryptography by tptacek on Thursday July 07, 2016 @03:00PM (#12051418)
Are the TLS constructions they're using documented anywhere? Is this a combination of Ring-LWE and, say, ECC, in case there are as-yet-unknown implementation faults in Ring-LWE?
Re:Experimenting with Post-Quantum Cryptography by agl on Thursday July 07, 2016 @03:03PM (#12051438)
We haven't written a spec because we don't intend for this to be widespread. However, the spec would basically be: run both X25519 and NewHope concurrently, concatenate their outputs and feed that into the TLS KDF as normal.

It is indeed a combination of R-LWE and ECC because it doesn't yet seem reasonable to depend on R-LWE alone. Not only because of the possibility of implementation faults in NewHope, but also because of the possibility of significant crypto-analytic advances against R-LWE, even with classical computers.

Re:Experimenting with Post-Quantum Cryptography by NobleSir on Thursday July 07, 2016 @03:41PM (#12051633)
Maybe this is a naive question, not knowing chrome well, but is the source available? Would love to play around with this..
Re:Experimenting with Post-Quantum Cryptography by baby on Thursday July 07, 2016 @04:01PM (#12051746)
Re:Experimenting with Post-Quantum Cryptography by aseipp on Thursday July 07, 2016 @05:28PM (#12052191)
Re:Experimenting with Post-Quantum Cryptography by NobleSir on Thursday July 07, 2016 @06:05PM (#12052371)
cool, thanks
Re:Experimenting with Post-Quantum Cryptography by mkj on Thursday July 07, 2016 @09:49PM (#12053171)