Re:Avast acquires rival AVG for $1.3B to create a security s...
by cptskippy on Thursday July 07, 2016 @09:29AM
(#12049152)
Anything that's been known for weeks can be stopped at the point of ingress such as the email server. They don't require a process actively taking up resources on your machine monitoring disk activity.
Re:Avast acquires rival AVG for $1.3B to create a security s...
by viraptor on Thursday July 07, 2016 @09:45AM
(#12049253)
What about attachments with passwords? Or https? (assuming we're not using stupid ideas like ssl unpacking proxy)
Re:Avast acquires rival AVG for $1.3B to create a security s...
by cptskippy on Thursday July 07, 2016 @10:21AM
(#12049461)
Blocking and filtering email attachments is pretty easy. There's plenty of email gateways that remove attachments from unknown/unsafe senders and replace it with hoops a user has to jump through to get the attachment. This is enough to discourage users from opening most malware.
For websites, malware hosts can be easily blocked at the gateway level. This won't protect you if someone manages to host malware on a common site like yahoo.com but will catch the vast majority.
These days it's pretty easy to circumvent or disable Antivirus or obfuscate your malware form it. If malware manages to get itself onto a user's machine then you've already lost.
Re:Avast acquires rival AVG for $1.3B to create a security s...
by penguinduck on Thursday July 07, 2016 @12:57PM
(#12050557)
Some systems will scan the email content and try to guess the password; if they can't, they'll block the attachment.
AVs are still useful for "we're employing 1000s of people, some of them are bound to open that bad word document in the email". Useless for targeted attacks, but useful for worms with signatures known for weeks. If you can't deal with the issue in some other way, AVs still give you something.