News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Let’s make peer review scientific by teacup50 on Wednesday July 06, 2016 @01:07PM (#12044435)
I agree with most of your points, but disagree strenuously with this one:

It's 2016, and these dead, flat, static PDFs are functionally identical to the paper they replaced!

There's a lot of value in static PDFs and how we format documents for publication. $CURRENT_YEAR doesn't invalidate good ideas from ($CURRENT_YEAR-n).

Just in terms of technology, static PDFs are:

- Easily distributed. - Easily archived. - Readable forever, even as platforms change incompatibly. - Readable on any device.

20 years from now, do you really want to have to run an old browser, or debug shoddy JS/HTML/whatever, just to read a paper from $CURRENT_YEAR-20?

There are no comments on this comment yet.