News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Go’s march to low-latency GC by karma_vaccum123 on Wednesday July 06, 2016 @09:32AM (#12042919)
Then we might be in some alternate reality talking about how Twitch could never deliver a viable service because the developers kept creating segfaults. C is the last language I would choose in a race to a viable service.
Re:Go’s march to low-latency GC by coldtea on Wednesday July 06, 2016 @09:30PM (#12046968)
>C is the last language I would choose in a race to a viable service.

And yet, the majority of services the world relies on everyday, from OSes and drivers, to Google search, NASA code, medical devices, etc are written in C/C++.

Re:Go’s march to low-latency GC by joejev on Wednesday July 06, 2016 @03:07PM (#12045158)
Too bad no one can deploy linux servers because of all the segfaults.
Re:Go’s march to low-latency GC by serge2k on Wednesday July 06, 2016 @06:42PM (#12046364)
I'm flabbergasted that people are able to post to this thread at all, what with all the segfaults their C++ based browsers must be experiencing all the time.
Re:Go’s march to low-latency GC by tracker1 on Wednesday July 06, 2016 @08:38PM (#12046831)
I experienced quite a few kernel panics in the earlier days... Generally from poor drivers, but just the same.