CSS is powerful, you can do a lot of things without JS

Re:CSS is powerful, you can do a lot of things without JS by ricardobeat on Tuesday July 05, 2016 @07:43AM (#12035721)

transition has been standardized and available in all browsers for years already, that is only necessary as fallback for very old browsers.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CSS is powerful, you can do a lot of things without JS by talmand on Tuesday July 05, 2016 @10:49AM (#12036793)

The only reason I use the webkit prefix on transition is for Android, otherwise I would say it isn't necessary at all.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CSS is powerful, you can do a lot of things without JS by ry_ry on Tuesday July 05, 2016 @12:26PM (#12037581)

Still a suprising number of old safari builds out in the wild, from a very quick look at our GA. Largely elderly iphones I assume?

Either way, I'm reticent to pull the WebKit prefixes from our mixins for now.

I wonder if my employers would be interested in releasing (& aggregating with other relatively large sites) our browser usage stats to create a categorised set of current 'real world' stats?

[ Parent | on HN ]