News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Betrayed by a bitfield (2012). Parent comment

Re:Betrayed by a bitfield (2012) by mikeash on Sunday July 03, 2016 @01:19PM (#12026779)
Right, but there's only one here. Is it just an attempt to future proof in case they add a second?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Betrayed by a bitfield (2012) by arcticbull on Sunday July 03, 2016 @03:02PM (#12027185)
Likely their standard practice so the addition of a second field is immaterial. Does look funky though.
[ Parent | on HN ]