Apple Fires Back at Spotify for Asking for 'Preferential Treatment'

Re:Apple Fires Back at Spotify for Asking for 'Preferential ... by UnoriginalGuy on Friday July 01, 2016 @05:19PM (#12019722)

> It is currently an established fact. If that changes, then we will have to revisit. But as of now, it stands.

It hasn't been ruled on. So, no, it hasn't been established.

> Remember, the market is mobile as a whole, not just iOS.

Why are you copying and pasting? I won't reply to this again, you already posted this above.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple Fires Back at Spotify for Asking for 'Preferential ... by coldtea on Friday July 01, 2016 @05:27PM (#12019788)

>Why are you copying and pasting?

Rephrasing the same thing, while refusing to understand terms with clear formal definitions, is not that different from copying and pasting.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple Fires Back at Spotify for Asking for 'Preferential ... by UnoriginalGuy on Friday July 01, 2016 @05:35PM (#12019847)

There is no formal definition for what we're discussing, that's the entire point. A market has no fixed definition, it is up to a court to define it.

It was a copy/paste, they changed literally one word, and ignored my response to that same point above.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple Fires Back at Spotify for Asking for 'Preferential ... by st3v3r on Friday July 01, 2016 @06:18PM (#12020103)

That's not true at all. The market is very clearly all of mobile software. You do not need a court to define that.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple Fires Back at Spotify for Asking for 'Preferential ... by st3v3r on Friday July 01, 2016 @05:21PM (#12019744)

"Why are you copying and pasting? I won't reply to this again, you already posted this above."

Yet, you continue to say the same thing in every one of your comments, trying to define the market so as to ignore other mobile OSes. If you're going to post the same thing, then expect to get the same responses.

[ Parent | on HN ]