[dead]
Re:Beamforming in PulseAudio
by arunarunarun on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @04:19PM
(#12004488)
1. I was pretty clear about not being a DSP-person
2. The module provides infrastructure for other beamformer implementations to be plugged in, my implementation is intended to be a trivial test
3. module-beamformer did not ship (the link points to a branch in my git repository)
> What is it about audio that attracts this curious level of "engineering"?
What is it about HN that attracts haters of open source POCs? Why don't you contribute and implement an FIR filter? You probably won't, because it's easier to bash someone's work rather than do the work yourself.
[dead]
I believe that you know a lot about signal processing, but please don't express it in a snarky, dismissive way. If you can't post civilly and substantively, please don't post at all.
Re:Beamforming in PulseAudio
by hatsunearu on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @05:06PM
(#12004824)
POC? Why is this a race thing?
Re:Beamforming in PulseAudio
by justinsaccount on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @05:12PM
(#12004859)
proof of concept.
Re:Beamforming in PulseAudio
by CamperBob2 on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @08:09PM
(#12005786)
For what it's worth, I had exactly the same thought.
My dang-compliant version of the same sentiment would go something like, "If you're going to write posts for public consumption, please consider limiting the topic to things you actually know about. You never know who might read and/or learn from what you write."