News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We built voice modulation to mask gender in technical int... by zeveb on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @02:57PM (#12003796)
> My theory is that this is tied to (In the US) men being more tolerant of taking risks, which leads to being more tolerant of failure, which leads to being able to more easily "dust oneself off."

There are some pretty obvious evolutionary psychology reasons for men to take more risks. Whether evolutionary psychology is just a bunch of just-so stories or not, that's another discussion.

Re:We built voice modulation to mask gender in technical int... by cauterized on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @04:04PM (#12004386)
There are plenty of enculturation reasons too. Doesn't need to have an evolutionary or biological basis.
Re:We built voice modulation to mask gender in technical int... by generalledger on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @05:16PM (#12004888)
I don't know if this is true, but intuitively it seems that something is more likely to be ingrained in a culture if there is already a biological basis for the behavior.
Re:We built voice modulation to mask gender in technical int... by cauterized on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @07:35PM (#12005644)
I still strongly question that. For instance, it could be that our double-standard expectations of women create more cognitive dissonance - which might impact confidence or give women a sense that whichever choice they make will be judged as "wrong". Or perhaps girls are less likely to be given the benefit of the doubt when they make mistakes in childhood - teaching them to be less resilient or risk-taking - without there being any biological reason to judge them more harshly.