News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Urbit Is Building a 'Virtual Galaxy' for Bitcoin Nodes by Avshalom on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @02:07PM (#12003418)
It's just an application server. It's a VM, it connects to other VMs, they run programs, sometimes locally, sometimes remotely, sometimes distributed.

This is all apparently very novel.

Re:Urbit Is Building a 'Virtual Galaxy' for Bitcoin Nodes by vertex-four on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @02:26PM (#12003565)
The novel bits are:

* Everything on the VM is purely functional, and inputs essentially cause transactions which can fail/succeed - the result being that it's supposedly easier to implement certain types of network protocols, specifically the ones that Ames implements

* A somewhat decent revision-controlled filesystem with push/pull/merge, static typing of files, and a built-in build system of sorts

And last but not least...

* Feudalism built into the core p2p protocol as an explicit design decision

Re:Urbit Is Building a 'Virtual Galaxy' for Bitcoin Nodes by semi-extrinsic on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @02:09PM (#12003440)
Also, it's been under development for the better part of a decade.
Re:Urbit Is Building a 'Virtual Galaxy' for Bitcoin Nodes by mahyarm on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @02:08PM (#12003425)
So something like sandstorm with an autoscaler?
Re:Urbit Is Building a 'Virtual Galaxy' for Bitcoin Nodes by api on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @03:05PM (#12003878)
That's like saying a snowmobile is a horse on skis. This is more like a total re-implementation of computing based on a functional model and a re-implementation of networking based on a feudal/federated shared/distributed/content-addressable model.
Re:Urbit Is Building a 'Virtual Galaxy' for Bitcoin Nodes by Avshalom on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @04:03PM (#12004378)
Meh, it's a new VM and a dumb network topology. I don't know sandstorm so I'm not sure which of these you think is the horse in this analogy.