Re:WireGuard: next generation in-kernel modern VPN
by hueving on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @01:21AM
(#11999657)
I was not concerned about it from a security perspective at all. What I'm concerned about is poor software engineering. The fact that something like a particular flavor of VPN needs to be integrated directly into the kernel smells to me like a shortcut to skip improving the kernel to enable better userland networking code. Why this VPN proto and not the next hot item of the month? How about we start throwing some load balancing code directly into the kernel? How about some TLS termination?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:WireGuard: next generation in-kernel modern VPN
by tristor on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @05:03AM
(#12000349)
> How about we start throwing some load balancing code directly into the kernel?
You mean like lvs/ipvs? [0]
> How about some TLS termination?
You mean like the KTLS project from Dave Watson/Facebook Engineering? [1][2]
[0] http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/software/index.html