Re:Woman wins $10k judgment against Microsoft for forced Win...
by fapjacks on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @03:23PM
(#11996721)
It's really quite simple: http://unix.stackexchange.com/a/74172/28974
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Woman wins $10k judgment against Microsoft for forced Win...
by blakeyrat on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @04:00PM
(#11997037)
Right but that very answer says:
> Newly created processes will use the updated contents, running applications will access the old version.
In other words, currently running code is still running the known-buggy version, exactly what I said originally that kicked-off this whole discussion.
Re:Woman wins $10k judgment against Microsoft for forced Win...
by fapjacks on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @11:56PM
(#11999397)
No, what you said was: "until you reboot, your Linux box is still running the known-buggy code"
And then later in the same post (just so we're clear about what you said): "But unless you reboot after installing your Linux updates, your computer still has the bugs."
Linux does not require a reboot to update.