Re:“I have a copy of a Terrorism Blacklist. Should it be sha...
by FoundTheStuff on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @02:52PM
(#11996433)
It's actually code for: "I'm willing to be reasonable and seriously consider both legal and ethical arguments you may have."
This isn't about money.
[yeah, I'm the original Reddit poster]
Re:“I have a copy of a Terrorism Blacklist. Should it be sha...
by mthoms on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @04:24PM
(#11997229)
I like that you posted this to gather opinions and create a discussion around the ethical implications of it all. Kudos.
I'm wondering why you chose to use your real name though. Seems like there would be little benefit and very high risk in doing so.
Re:“I have a copy of a Terrorism Blacklist. Should it be sha...
by FoundTheStuff on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @04:27PM
(#11997268)
I've used it before in reporting large data finds (such as US voter databases). It's really more about standing up and saying "I'm not afraid."
Re:“I have a copy of a Terrorism Blacklist. Should it be sha...
by gotothewayforwa on Wednesday June 29, 2016 @04:31PM
(#12004599)
I'm not afraid too! Let's be friends! (David House)
Edit: Public figure ala Snowden. Please reconsider your removal of my personal information, and consider that I am faithful in my motives, ala the poster I have responded to. Kthx. judging of HN increases
Re:“I have a copy of a Terrorism Blacklist. Should it be sha...
by jacquesm on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @05:25PM
(#11997715)
Ok, thanks for the clarification. It looked a little strange, that wording.
Re:“I have a copy of a Terrorism Blacklist. Should it be sha...
by advisedwang on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @03:16PM
(#11996655)
Or maybe "If you are a journalist who can use this responsibly".
Re:“I have a copy of a Terrorism Blacklist. Should it be sha...
by sliverstorm on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @02:29PM
(#11996224)
Yeah that seems like a pretty bald-faced attempt to solicit bribes.
Is that code for 'if you pay me enough'?