Re:NSA tracking cellphone locations worldwide, Snowden docum...
by nickik on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @08:34AM
(#11993201)
Just because those young who voted does not mean that those young that did not vote, would vote the same.
I would assume that is not the case here, but its something to consider.
Re:NSA tracking cellphone locations worldwide, Snowden docum...
by nxzero on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @07:24AM
(#11992816)
>> "In mid 2013 there were about 5.8m people between 18 and 24."
Which is what percentage of the voting population?
Re:NSA tracking cellphone locations worldwide, Snowden docum...
by DanBC on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @08:33AM
(#11993189)
Mid 2013 there were 51.8m people aged between 18 and 89.
If we assume all of them can vote 5.8m is 11% of 51.8m.
Re:NSA tracking cellphone locations worldwide, Snowden docum...
by tehwalrus on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @08:30AM
(#11993173)
Total votes on either side were roughly 16 vs 17.5 million.
Re:NSA tracking cellphone locations worldwide, Snowden docum...
by dasboth on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @08:23AM
(#11993115)
This was the biggest problem with the referendum: apathy from the younger voters.
Re:NSA tracking cellphone locations worldwide, Snowden docum...
by tomp on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @09:44AM
(#11993706)
You're asuming that the ones that didn't vote would have the same distribution as those that did.
Instead, maybe they actually were apathic, and their votes would be roughly 50-50 - so Leave could still win.
If they'd had 75% turnout they may have swung the election.
In mid 2013 there were about 5.8m people between 18 and 24.