News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NSA tracking cellphone locations worldwide, Snowden docum... by DanBC on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @07:02AM (#11992734)
But voter turnout for younger people (18 to 24) was less than 40%.

If they'd had 75% turnout they may have swung the election.

In mid 2013 there were about 5.8m people between 18 and 24.

Re:NSA tracking cellphone locations worldwide, Snowden docum... by nickik on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @08:34AM (#11993201)
Just because those young who voted does not mean that those young that did not vote, would vote the same.

I would assume that is not the case here, but its something to consider.

Re:NSA tracking cellphone locations worldwide, Snowden docum... by nxzero on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @07:24AM (#11992816)
>> "In mid 2013 there were about 5.8m people between 18 and 24."

Which is what percentage of the voting population?

Re:NSA tracking cellphone locations worldwide, Snowden docum... by DanBC on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @08:33AM (#11993189)
Mid 2013 there were 51.8m people aged between 18 and 89.

If we assume all of them can vote 5.8m is 11% of 51.8m.

Re:NSA tracking cellphone locations worldwide, Snowden docum... by tehwalrus on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @08:30AM (#11993173)
Total votes on either side were roughly 16 vs 17.5 million.
Re:NSA tracking cellphone locations worldwide, Snowden docum... by dasboth on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @08:23AM (#11993115)
This was the biggest problem with the referendum: apathy from the younger voters.
Re:NSA tracking cellphone locations worldwide, Snowden docum... by tomp on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @09:44AM (#11993706)
You're asuming that the ones that didn't vote would have the same distribution as those that did.

Instead, maybe they actually were apathic, and their votes would be roughly 50-50 - so Leave could still win.

Re:NSA tracking cellphone locations worldwide, Snowden docum... by DanBC on Tuesday June 28, 2016 @09:54AM (#11993777)
I'm going by, admittedly lousy, polling which consistently shows young people prefered remain.