News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Woman wins $10k judgment against Microsoft for forced Win... by seanp2k2 on Monday June 27, 2016 @02:29PM (#11988298)
You have to pay to have the option to not be spied on, because only the version designed to be used for serious business supports disabling the first-party tracking, because business users are important and home users are just another revenue channel.

I now have even less moral issue with not paying to use Windows for personal use. Seriously, they should have just made it free for home users regardless of Win7 license state (I've had terrible luck with "upgraded" versions of Windows -- clean installs only for me, and yes I know about the Insider program and the exception to this...I didn't stay up on the news and I missed the "must be installed by" deadline).

Re:Woman wins $10k judgment against Microsoft for forced Win... by FussyZeus on Monday June 27, 2016 @02:32PM (#11988331)
If it makes you feel better, my mother was on an insider build because we figured she would get Windows either free or at a discount, and she ended up having to buy retail anyway.