> but also the vast majority of his audience are hackers. And these hackers are curious enough to read the strange language choice and think about what that might mean.

The focus of this very comment thread is proof that isn’t the case. Plenty of us agree with the basic premise, but take issue at his entire approach to communicating with people, and thus don’t consider the article “good”.

> If he really wanted to make an approachable article, this should be titled

Or he could just write it like he’s expecting adults to read it, and drop the condescending and childish names he makes up for everything he disagrees with.