Re:Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
by aninhumer on Monday June 27, 2016 @02:21AM
(#11984461)
Well it's nice that the true believers get something entertaining to read, but there are a lot of people looking for reasons to disagree or criticise who might find themselves converted if he put in some effort to address his arguments to them. As the figurehead of Free Software, we should expect more from him than esoteric literature.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
by p4wnc6 on Monday June 27, 2016 @10:17AM
(#11986259)
It's not the true believers who should be happiest about the effects of ergodic writing. Instead, it's the ones who disagree, but for serious reasons. If someone would only be converted if the writer makes it super easy, then I think e.g. Stallman feels like why should he waste his time on someone like that?