Re:Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
by superobserver on Sunday June 26, 2016 @05:17PM
(#11982769)
You can hate the argument all you like; although such an emotionally charged term being levelled against the argument itself is curious but probably not particularly informative. It also doesn't change the way Facebook violates norms of privacy in a number of ways that should give people pause for thought, at any rate. RMS has put forward excellent reasons that detract from the use of the platform.
Re:Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
by cortesoft on Sunday June 26, 2016 @10:27PM
(#11983866)
I was not using the term 'hate' in the emotional sense. Perhaps a better choice of words would be to say that I find the argument disingenuous; almost everyone these days knows what Facebook does for a living, so to act like Facebook users are somehow being tricked is simply untrue.
Re:Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
by superobserver on Sunday June 26, 2016 @09:14PM
(#11983678)
Re:Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
by pdonis on Sunday June 26, 2016 @10:48PM
(#11983930)
> I think most people have a pretty good idea of how Facebook is making money.
I don't. I think most people don't even think about how Facebook is making money. They just see that it doesn't cost them any money, and they think "oh, great, I can connect with people for free!" and use it without considering the costs or the bigger picture. This certainly describes practically everyone I know personally who uses Facebook.
Now, we can argue whether users are aware of what they are trading, or if the trade is fair, but I think most people have a pretty good idea of how Facebook is making money.