Dotty: a next generation compiler for Scala

Re:Dotty: a next generation compiler for Scala by pfn on Wednesday June 22, 2016 @01:40PM (#11955641)

actually, the latter is far more readable without markup making my eyes bleed.

I generally prefer gradle's method of 'com.foocorp:foo:1.2' but that isn't acceptable statically. scala string interpolators could make it a thing, though.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dotty: a next generation compiler for Scala by harveywi on Wednesday June 22, 2016 @01:59PM (#11955746)

Unfortunately, we have things like this in the mix...

  libraryDependencies += "com.lihaoyi" %% "scalatags" % "0.4.3"

  libraryDependencies += "com.lihaoyi" %%% "scalatags" % "0.4.3"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dotty: a next generation compiler for Scala by virtualwhys on Thursday June 23, 2016 @12:59AM (#11958934)

To be fair you'd only be using one or the other, `%%` for jvm-only, and `%%%` for cross platform jvm/js builds.

Far and away the biggest blocker to learning sbt is the shaky IDE support for the build project. Apparently that's coming up next in 1.0; will be nice to click through to source from sbt build files and instantly grok what X symbol means. Have wasted a lot of time over the years slogging through documentation...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dotty: a next generation compiler for Scala by lmm on Thursday June 23, 2016 @01:51PM (#11963008)

A build definition format that allows arbitrary code anywhere is always going to have less-good IDE support than one based on declarative documents.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dotty: a next generation compiler for Scala by kmiroslav on Thursday June 23, 2016 @02:21PM (#11963233)

I don't see why, as long as the IDE sees the build file as a genuine source file for the language it's written in.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dotty: a next generation compiler for Scala by lmm on Monday June 27, 2016 @08:37AM (#11985746)

The IDE would need to run it to understand the build definition, which then gets into halting-problem issues.

[ Parent | on HN ]