We're not religious about REST. For example, see:
https://www.pandastrike.com/posts/20151215-http-rest-great-b...
and
https://www.pandastrike.com/posts/20160210-rest-is-the-wrong...
We've also tried to be specific in how you might approach addressing the limitations of HTTP in a way more consistent with the design of the protocol:
https://www.pandastrike.com/posts/20151022-rest-data-api
and
https://www.pandastrike.com/posts/20160509-http-is-the-new-l...
In fact, our thesis in this article is not about REST at all, but the design goals of projects like Falcor, which may be unrealistic. And it's those unrealistic expectations of what's possible are why people are turning from HTTP.
Re:You Can't Turn the Network Invisible
by mwcampbell on Wednesday June 22, 2016 @12:49PM
(#11955279)
OK, I was wrong to accuse you of being religious about REST. Thanks for the links.
More generally, I'm skeptical of any hard-line position which insists that you just have to stay pure and follow the true way. I already rejected one religion; I don't want to get sucked into another.