News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TV Advertising by icebraining on Wednesday June 22, 2016 @11:44AM (#11954790)
Moreover, the Internet has conditioned people to think "Subscription = No ads!"

Wasn't that the promise of the early cable TV? How long did that last?

Re:TV Advertising by dragonwriter on Wednesday June 22, 2016 @11:52AM (#11954840)
> Wasn't that the promise of the early cable TV?

No, early cable TV was a way to provide signals from broadcast (and, thus, ad supported) channels to areas where, for geographic reasons, there was poor reception.

(The CATV acronym frequently used for cable TV originated as an acronym for its earlier name, "Community Antenna Television" -- reflecting it as a model of consumers sharing an antenna to receive broadcast signal.)

Premium, ad-free content, cable-specific programming didn't turn up until decades later. So, you've basically got it backward: instead of being something that originally promised subscription fees for no ads content but fell away from that, cable is something that initially offered subscription fees for access to ad-supported broadcast content but later evolved to include subscription-based (and pay-per-view) ad-free content available on top of the basic ad-supported content.

Re:TV Advertising by toomuchtodo on Wednesday June 22, 2016 @08:46PM (#11958164)
> 74% of Netflix subscribers would ditch the service over ads

http://bgr.com/2016/06/22/netflix-price-hike-ads/

Re:TV Advertising by GFischer on Friday June 24, 2016 @04:06PM (#11973014)
That's not the most rigorous of samples (reddit users), I believe those results might be biased - I think commenters on sites such as Reddit or HN might be more likely to take this kind of actions.

I'm not sure what Netflix's endgame is, but they're leaving a LOT of money on the table by going subscription-only.