News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learning by arcanus on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @02:26PM (#11948116)
> The Hessian is too expensive and too big.

Not necessarily, often derivatives are analytically known in ML.

> MPI is not great at even high hundreds of cores

? You realize that Sequia, which I have run on, has codes that scale to all two million processors.

Re:Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learning by oliwaw on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @03:43PM (#11948830)
>Not necessarily, often derivatives are analytically known in ML.

The focus here is largely on deep neural networks. In this domain, the Hessian cannot be computed and SGD (with minor variants) continues to be the golden standard.

Re:Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learning by x0x0 on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @02:47PM (#11948297)
Sure, you can build highly reliable supercomputers. But the majority of us are running on google style networks of mostly-reliable boxes. I worked for a company that built distributed ML software, and even at eg hundreds of boxes you will regularly see failures. Customers will be very unhappy unless your code tolerates that.