News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Chasing the DAO Attacker’s Wake – A second exploit. Parent comment

Re:Chasing the DAO Attacker’s Wake – A second exploit by axlee on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @12:56PM (#11947195)
If this code style is an absolute requirement for the code not to be exploited, it should be probably be built-in in the language specification itself.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Chasing the DAO Attacker’s Wake – A second exploit by happyslobro on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @03:09PM (#11948510)
Or at least, we should have a linter, and strongly encourage it's use. Maybe make a rule of disclosing linter warnings when presenting contracts.
[ Parent | on HN ]