“But he does good work.”

Re:“But he does good work.” by ultramancool on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @10:54AM (#11946035)

Yes, but unless I'm mistaken, none of those people have publicly put their name on a rape accusation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“But he does good work.” by wiredfool on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @10:56AM (#11946059)

This seems to meet the definition of attacked:

   The convincing turned into trying to pull her away   
   physically, grabbing at her hands. I locked my arm with
   hers, and put myself in between her and Jake. All while he
   was trying to reach around me, while he was telling me to
   let go.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“But he does good work.” by ultramancool on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @10:57AM (#11946070)

Not raped though, which is what I was trying to get at. Sorry if I was vague. You're right, the evidence of many other incidents is indeed there.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“But he does good work.” by kafkaesq on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @03:51PM (#11948912)

In conjunction with the description of involuntary genital exploration that normally precedes the above quote it was, unambiguously, an episode of sexual assault.

You can debate whether digital-only -- but nonetheless involuntary -- stimulation fits the legal definition of "rape" in this or that jurisdiction, if you want. But if so, you'd be splitting hairs.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“But he does good work.” by ultramancool on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @09:35PM (#11950993)

Yeah, check the post times.

[ Parent | on HN ]