News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Monaco Code Editor by luckystarr on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @03:59AM (#11944178)
In the "I need to do this quickly to finish my sprint" world.
Re:The Monaco Code Editor by konschubert on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @04:06AM (#11944220)
Wasn't V8 written in a cottage in Denmark? http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/03775904-177c-11de-8c9d-0000779fd2... I cannot imagine that they would take unreasonable shortcuts.
Re:The Monaco Code Editor by luckystarr on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @07:36AM (#11944959)
Well, unreasonable now was probably perfectly reasonable at the time of implementation. Perhaps they even have or had a plan to improve upon it, but given other tasks (ES6, etc.) it hasn't been given much priority.

I mean, why would they fix it with high priority if the engine already has reasonable performance and the benchmarks are happy as well?

Re:The Monaco Code Editor by egeozcan on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @04:17AM (#11944271)
Even then, why include comments? Is it to support stuff like multi-line strings as comments hack[1]?

[1]: https://github.com/sindresorhus/multiline