Re:Docker 1.12: Now with Built-In Orchestration
by kerr23 on Monday June 20, 2016 @08:51PM
(#11942772)
> My real complaint is that none of these give you a way to do persistence that doesn't destroy some other really nice properties of containers.
100% agree with you there.
> It mostly just keeps them even with Kubernetes at best. And an imitation of it at worst.
Personally, when I looked at kubernetes, mesos, etc and saw the xml hell that i'd be living in and said "no way".
If i have to run something as complex as those to have docker then it's not worth it to me.
When I look at the new docker swarm stuff. For the first time I think that docker is a viable thing (assuming it all works). because I'm not adding additional complexity to get my docker simplicity.
Re:Docker 1.12: Now with Built-In Orchestration
by Drdrdrq on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @12:37AM
(#11943526)
Not sure why you are being downvoted. My sentiment is similar... Docker's historical advantage over other solutions is easy-to-use interface ( including Dockerfile). Can't wait to try swarm out.
100% agree with you there.
> It mostly just keeps them even with Kubernetes at best. And an imitation of it at worst.
Personally, when I looked at kubernetes, mesos, etc and saw the xml hell that i'd be living in and said "no way".
If i have to run something as complex as those to have docker then it's not worth it to me.
When I look at the new docker swarm stuff. For the first time I think that docker is a viable thing (assuming it all works). because I'm not adding additional complexity to get my docker simplicity.