Re:UTF-8 Everywhere (2012)
by scrollaway on Sunday June 19, 2016 @10:03PM
(#11935692)
Why is this still the case? UTF8 is dominant now, wouldn't it make more sense to assume UTF8?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
The older the site, the less likely it is that it will have been updated. Therefore, it's reasonable to assume that newer sites will either declare UTF-8, or can be modified to declare UTF-8, while old sites stay the way they always were, pre-UTF-8.
Keeping the backwards-compatibility heuristic the same makes sense.
Re:UTF-8 Everywhere (2012)
by TazeTSchnitzel on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @07:37AM
(#11944962)
Old sites lacked encoding declarations, and old browsers (e.g. early versions of IE) didn't support them.
Sites that want UTF-8 can ask for it.