News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:China issues demolition order on world’s largest religiou... by toyg on Saturday June 18, 2016 @08:39AM (#11928297)
> If it's a choice between your human rights and someone else's life — obviously.

So if I unjustly imprison you, and the only way for you to escape is by killing me, will you willingly stay imprisoned forever? It's an... admirable stance, although so unpopular that you'll likely find not even Gandhi on your side.

(honestly, historical trivia is relatively irrelevant to the whole Israel/Palestine debate, which has great moral issues to argue -- if your people suffered apartheid and holocaust, are you justified in doing the same to others "in self-defence"? How long does it take for populations to forego ethnic grievances and land claims? Will nations ever renounce ultimate sovereignty to the UN? etc etc)

Re:China issues demolition order on world’s largest religiou... by Eerie on Saturday June 18, 2016 @09:01AM (#11928398)
>So if I unjustly imprison you, and the only way for you to escape is by killing me

Completely wrong analogy. The killing doesn't help you escape at all, it just angers the jailer (who you can't touch anyway).

Re:China issues demolition order on world’s largest religiou... by toyg on Saturday June 18, 2016 @09:30AM (#11928517)
It was not an analogy, it was an hypothetical situation. If my human rights end where loss of life on your side begins, then according to that stated belief, the situation I mentioned is morally acceptable, is it not?