Re:Why The U.S. Economy Is Dying And Is Simply Not Going To ...
by fnid2 on Monday March 15, 2010 @05:52AM
(#1192574)
Really? One of the forbes links says this:
based on credit default swap spreads there is a 3.1%
chance of a U.S. default in the next five years,
according to CMA, a London credit information specialist
http://www.forbes.com/2010/01/20/united-states-debt-10-busin...That's pretty bad. Also, I didn't notice any contradictions. Maybe your hyperbolic remarks are true. Maybe Corporations are greedy -- they do have a fiduciary responsibility to increase shareholder wealth. Maybe Globalism is bad -- think global act local right? Globalization is the opposite of that! Also, I think the article said it was pretty much the leaders fault, what with a pic of GWB on one of the pages, or did you read that one?
it seems pretty plain that it's the investment equivalent of a supermarket tabloid
Is that ad hominem? Which statements the article includes aren't true?
Re:Why The U.S. Economy Is Dying And Is Simply Not Going To ...
by anigbrowl on Monday March 15, 2010 @01:24PM
(#1193460)
There's a reason I qualified and contextualized my opinion. I did not allege falsehood but rather complained of shallow and incoherent presentation.
Re:Why The U.S. Economy Is Dying And Is Simply Not Going To ...
by joe_the_user on Monday March 15, 2010 @07:33PM
(#1194431)
It's a shallow, contradictory gloss filled with all the usual rhetoric.
The unemployment statistics it showed did seem pretty significant if they are true.
Normally I'd do a more substantive rebuttal, but after looking at the front page of businessinsider.com, it seems pretty plain that it's the investment equivalent of a supermarket tabloid. Although the article touches on many real economic problems it does so in a very shallow fashion, tossing worst-case scenarios together almost at random.