News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ECMAScript 2016 Approved by astazangasta on Friday June 17, 2016 @10:46AM (#11922921)
Horsehit - mass opinion obviously matters a lot more on this subject, since there is no way to enforce our arbitrary kowtowing to Paul Graham's wisdom. What is he going to do, yell at us for down voting incorrectly?

This is our website. Maybe pg 'made' it, but we use it. If most of us disagree that is what will (and should in my opinion) happen.

Re:ECMAScript 2016 Approved by tlrobinson on Friday June 17, 2016 @10:56AM (#11922982)
Hacker News has remained a relatively civil place for far longer than most online forums largely because of the policies pg and other admins have put in place.
Re:ECMAScript 2016 Approved by astazangasta on Friday June 17, 2016 @11:15AM (#11923105)
And the self-policing of its users is the force that makes that happen, not the opinion of the admins.
Re:ECMAScript 2016 Approved by coldtea on Friday June 17, 2016 @03:58PM (#11925181)
>What is he going to do, yell at us for down voting incorrectly

He can always close down the side.

Besides, it's not about "what is he going to do" -- it's about what people coming here should respect.

Re:ECMAScript 2016 Approved by astazangasta on Friday June 17, 2016 @04:16PM (#11925278)
He could, but it's unlikely he will close the site over improper downvoting behavior (which is rampant, but unimportant). And what I think people here should (and do) respect is the general spirit of civility; we respect Paul Graham's wishes because he asked for civility, not vice-versa. If Paul Graham asked us to be pointlessly cruel, we would not respect that (or we would be congregating elsewhere).

Therefore, what matters most in practice is the mass opinion of users of the site - what do we think is most useful and respectful in daily usage (following Paul Graham's lead to be respectful because we can all agree that this is a good idea).