News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Serverless Architectures. Parent comment

Re:Serverless Architectures by mikebroberts on Friday June 17, 2016 @09:09AM (#11922399)
Hi Mike,

Article author here. Don't worry, I'll be laying on some cold, hard, reality later in the series. I definitely don't encourage SPAs universally and I'll be talking extensively about the concerns of handing over responsibility to vendors.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Serverless Architectures by mikegerwitz on Friday June 17, 2016 @09:33AM (#11922528)
Thanks for the reply, Mike; I'm looking forward to reading your opinions, and I'm glad you'll be discussing it.

From a technical perspective, your article was very informative, and I did learn from it, so thank you for the information.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Serverless Architectures by nickpsecurity on Friday June 17, 2016 @04:32PM (#11925361)
I appreciate you not only explaining it but coming up with two, alternate terms that don't sound so dumb. As in, not calling a centralized architecture "serverless". Your names also fit within context of what people are calling other "N as a Service" schemes.
[ Parent | on HN ]