News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on ECMAScript 2016 Approved. Parent comment

Re:ECMAScript 2016 Approved by BurningFrog on Friday June 17, 2016 @01:01AM (#11920768)
The diff is very small, unless this document from January is outdated: http://www.2ality.com/2016/01/ecmascript-2016.html
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ECMAScript 2016 Approved by neogenix on Friday June 17, 2016 @01:07AM (#11920789)
No that is still correct. It is this line from the 'overview': "This specification also includes support for a new exponentiation operator and adds a new method to Array.prototype called includes."
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ECMAScript 2016 Approved by BinaryIdiot on Friday June 17, 2016 @01:13AM (#11920806)
Yeah I thought I was misreading things with how little changed. I guess the move to yearly really makes a difference there.
[ Parent | on HN ]