Re:Buffer Layoffs
by hondo77 on Thursday June 16, 2016 @06:39PM
(#11919464)
Two whole months (rolls eyes)? You think they did because of a sense of "family"? Maybe they didn't want employees leaving in this labor market and I'm guessing they didn't want to lay people off because others would take that as a signal to jump ship. Trust me, if things get bad, they'll let people go. Two months is not really bad.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Buffer Layoffs
by AndrewKemendo on Thursday June 16, 2016 @06:48PM
(#11919514)
You're right, two months isn't bad, but it was a sacrifice, something people in this thread seem to just assume isn't done by management.
It was a sacrifice for themselves and their equity. What does the cap table look like? Not laying off employees prevents a morale issue and gives more resources to keep building product. Don’t confuse other employees by trying to say it was a sacrifice for them, that is misleading, it wasn’t, but I’m sure the founders would love to sell it that way: “We’re doing this for you!”