News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Buffer Layoffs by __abc on Thursday June 16, 2016 @04:45PM (#11918740)
Why do this? I don't understand ... am I just being too old school / narrow minded about this?
Re:Buffer Layoffs by quonn on Thursday June 16, 2016 @04:51PM (#11918764)
I have several friends who have received large salary increases when they were about to quit. This clearly shows that they were payed too little before. The kind of transparency buffer shows in this sheet can prevent such a situation.
Re:Buffer Layoffs by kyleashipley on Thursday June 16, 2016 @09:39PM (#11920172)
Having a transparent formula for salary limits or removes the effects of negotiation, which likely benefits engineers (typically bad at negotiating compared to e.g. sales people) and women/minorities (worried about increasing "otherness" further and sometimes lower leverage, at least in tech).

There are potential downsides such as increased politics or income inequality pressures, but it seems like a viable policy at least. I'm curious how someone like Google's Laszlo Bock would respond to this approach in comparison to their "pay unfairly"[1] mentality.

[1] http://www.businessinsider.com/google-policy-to-pay-unfairly...

Re:Buffer Layoffs by mattmanser on Thursday June 16, 2016 @04:50PM (#11918758)
It's part of their ethos, be totally transparent on how much everyone gets paid. You can't negotiate or ask for a different salary, there's a calculation.

They've got blog posts about it.

https://open.buffer.com/introducing-open-salaries-at-buffer-...

Re:Buffer Layoffs by juliand on Thursday June 16, 2016 @06:11PM (#11919280)
Not only salaries but also expenses and income, among other things.
Re:Buffer Layoffs by vollmond on Thursday June 16, 2016 @04:57PM (#11918800)
IIRC, Fog Creek does the same and also have some explanatory posts.