Re:The Intel ME subsystem can take over your machine, can't ...
by SkyMarshal on Thursday June 16, 2016 @02:58PM
(#11918136)
You're right that the barrier to open hardware is very high, but I hope that open firmware may at least help mitigate, if not solve, this problem. Buy a machine with ME-like hardware, flash the firmware with something open source and trusted and which disables ME, or returns control to the system owner.
Re:The Intel ME subsystem can take over your machine, can't ...
by lordcorusa on Thursday June 16, 2016 @04:25PM
(#11918630)
ME operates above typical UEFI firmware. ME updates must be signed by Intel and Intel alone.
Re:The Intel ME subsystem can take over your machine, can't ...
by akavel on Thursday June 16, 2016 @05:04PM
(#11918845)
Aren't FPGAs a possible solution?
Re:The Intel ME subsystem can take over your machine, can't ...
by Santosh83 on Friday June 17, 2016 @03:18AM
(#11921121)
Well at least one incident seems to indicate that FPGAs can also have backdoors engineered into them just as easily: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2012/05/backdoor_foun...
We need the manufacturing process to also be opened up just as much as the chip design, but the latter seems an easier goal, though in itself still difficult thanks to IP and economics.
The germane question is, can a similar revolution happen for hardware? Can motivated individuals, or small groups of people, reasonably hope to design AND manufacture ALL the hardware for a modern computer? The answer is it's quite beyond the bounds of possibility. The tech is too complex, too closely guarded and manufacturing has HUGE upfront costs.
THAT is why hardware is currently completely dominated by a few big players, which allows them (and any other "agencies") complete control to essentially do as they wish.
We were able to make software creation egalitarian. Unless we can do the same for hardware (from ground-up), we will be ultimately controlled and never be in full control.