News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Guccifer 2.0: DNC's servers hacked by a lone hacker. Parent comment

Re:Guccifer 2.0: DNC's servers hacked by a lone hacker by admax88q on Thursday June 16, 2016 @09:38AM (#11915971)
> and that this was a "false flag" against the Clinton campaign

> If this were fake, you'd think it would be more damaging.

Why would you think it'd be more damaging if it were fake? If you're going to hack yourself to gain pity, you would obviously only release documents that didn't significantly damage your campaign.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Guccifer 2.0: DNC's servers hacked by a lone hacker by jontas on Thursday June 16, 2016 @12:53PM (#11917316)
I think the OP means fake meaning "fabricated to do damage to the DNC", not fake as in "created by the DNC for publicity". The suggestion is that if the intent was to do damage, the contents would've been made much more inflammatory.
[ Parent | on HN ]