Re:London Rents Eating Up 57% of Twentysomethings’ Income
by stuaxo on Wednesday June 15, 2016 @09:09AM
(#11909072)
Hm, if commuting, I prefer to live somewhere else entirely, the outskirts of London seem to have none of the advantages (places to go, things to do), but all the disadvantages.
Re:London Rents Eating Up 57% of Twentysomethings’ Income
by vidarh on Wednesday June 15, 2016 @12:18PM
(#11910226)
It is close enough to have the places to go and things to do, and the high paid jobs, but far enough to not pay central London house prices. To me that's highly attractive. Especially now that I rarely need to commute.
When I first moved to London, I lived in Farringdon and then Marble Arch, and the first couple of years it was awesome to be able to just step outside the door and be in the centre of town (at Marble Arch I literally had two minutes walk to be on Oxford Street, or could cross the road and be in Hyde Park). But the pollution was certainly awful - it's the only place I've lived where your snot would be black at the end of the day. And then I moved to Barnes (South West London - very leafy, very affluent), but when we decided to buy it was too expensive, and we ended up moving to Croydon (zone 5, South). I don't think I'll ever move closer in towards the centre again. If I were to consider moving elsewhere, it'd be either further out, or along the edge of London somewhere along one of the major train lines.
You get the option of working in the centre when it makes sense, it's far more relaxing, greener, far less pollution, and far cheaper.
I can see the appeal of moving somewhere else entirely, but this is a decent compromise for people who want easy access to London but don't want all the downsides of the centre.