News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Checked C by vintermann on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @02:52AM (#11900244)
I thought so too, but looking at their paper, they have an impressive survey of prior approaches, and they explain their differences from CCured quite well. CCured used fat pointers, and apparently modified the data pointed to by WILD pointers (something I didn't know).

This seems interesting to me. I liked the way CCured did inference to document how you used and abused your pointers, but what it did with that information was maybe not ideal.

Re:Checked C by haberman on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @03:27AM (#11900363)
A link to the paper you are mentioning would be helpful.
Re:Checked C by jsingleton on Tuesday June 14, 2016 @03:34AM (#11900378)