Re:Silk Icons: A Comprehensive Open Source Icon Set
by scorpioxy on Saturday March 13, 2010 @04:51PM
(#1189699)
Cynical?
What better way to show your skills to people who would contract you than to point at something as popular as his icon set?
Re:Silk Icons: A Comprehensive Open Source Icon Set
by bmelton on Saturday March 13, 2010 @10:41PM
(#1190214)
I meant it jokingly. It's a brilliant advertisement, to be sure; I think that most people just see things like that as done strictly out of the goodness of people's hearts, and while that may often be true, I usually am inclined to believe the more self-serving aspect of it.
Not that there's anything wrong with it whatsoever.
Re:Silk Icons: A Comprehensive Open Source Icon Set
by yesimahuman on Saturday March 13, 2010 @05:13PM
(#1189749)
How do you mean? His site hasn't been updated for 4 years. I don't know anything about the author.
Re:Silk Icons: A Comprehensive Open Source Icon Set
by noginn on Sunday March 14, 2010 @05:02AM
(#1190494)
This is the author: http://twitter.com/markjames
Re:Silk Icons: A Comprehensive Open Source Icon Set
by famfamfam on Monday March 15, 2010 @09:46AM
(#1192886)
I wish I had been foresighted enough to realise that the icons were more than the occasionally useful result of a period of insomnia. The set was started because I could not find a good icon set to use in a system I was developing.
I have done almost no icon design since this set was released; The icons have garnered me some personal infamy, and I make a little from text link ads, but I would kill the site if not for the fact that people still appear to find the icons useful and reliable.
For personal work, I use the fugue set linked previously.
If I were a more cynical man, I might even suppose that was exactly the reason for producing a royalty-free icon set -- to drum up business.